Key result
Initial rhythm control linked to over twofold higher 24-hour sinus conversion than rate control in POAF.
Why the study?
The optimal management strategy for postoperative atrial fibrillation following CABG remains debated, with the impact of rhythm control on clinical resource utilization and long-term outcomes unclear.
Does an initial rhythm control strategy improve sinus rhythm conversion and clinical outcomes in adult patients with new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation after isolated CABG compared to rate control alone?
Cohort (n=663)
No
Does an initial rhythm control strategy improve sinus rhythm conversion and clinical outcomes in adult patients with new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation after isolated CABG compared to rate control alone?
Odds Ratio: 2.65 (95% CI 1.19–4.07)
Absolute Event Rate: 71.7% vs 32.3%
p-value: p=0.010
While an initial rhythm control strategy for postoperative atrial fibrillation after CABG effectively restores early sinus rhythm, it does not improve long-term survival and is associated with prolonged ICU stays compared to rate control alone.
Rhythm control may boost early conversion after CABG AF but prolongs ICU stay without survival benefit; leaves open whether RCTs should test this strategy.
The optimal management strategy for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains debated. While rhythm control aims to restore sinus rhythm, its impact on clinical resource utilization and long-term outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between an initial rhythm control strategy (as an escalation to rate control) and clinical outcomes compared to rate control alone. This retrospective cohort study identified 663 adult patients who developed POAF after isolated CABG from the MIMIC-IV database. We used two statistical approaches to control for confounding: a primary analysis on a 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort and a sensitivity analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) on the entire cohort. The primary outcome was sinus rhythm (SR) conversion within 24 h. Secondary outcomes included length of ICU stay, acute kidney injury (AKI), and long-term mortality. The rhythm control strategy was associated with a higher 24-hour SR conversion rate compared to rate control (PSM cohort: 71.7% vs. 32.3%; OR, 2.65; P = 0.010). However, patients in the rhythm control group had a significantly longer ICU length of stay (median 3.42 vs. 3.08 days; P = 0.026). No significant differences were found in AKI incidence or long-term mortality. Subgroup analysis indicated that the benefit of SR conversion was attenuated in patients with diabetes (P for interaction < 0.05). Findings were consistent in the IPTW sensitivity analysis. Although effective for early rhythm restoration, an initial rhythm control strategy is associated with longer ICU stays and no survival benefit compared to rate control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Long et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=663). Rhythm control strategy vs. Rate control strategy was evaluated on Sinus rhythm (SR) conversion within 24 hours (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.19-4.07, p=0.010). An initial rhythm control strategy yielded a higher 24-hour sinus rhythm conversion rate than rate control (71.7% vs. 32.3%; OR 2.65) but was associated with longer ICU stays and no survival benefit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: