Demonstrates enhanced detection accuracy in aerial tiny objects by exploiting symmetry properties, suggesting improved methodologies.
Aerial tiny objects naturally possess conjugate symmetry in the frequency domain, yet complex scenarios, heavy clutter, and frequent rotation/occlusion lead to severe detail loss, inaccurate contour modeling, and high false/miss rates in existing detectors. Current Fourier-based methods neither leverage object symmetry nor coordinate with Fourier analysis to jointly enhance contour representation and spatial-frequency feature learning, suffering from weak fusion, phase-sensitive coefficient regression, and poor discriminability. To fill this gap, we propose the Frequency-Aware Fourier Series Detection Network (FAFSDet), which explicitly exploits the inherent symmetry of tiny objects and their frequency-domain representations. Specifically, FAFC (Frequency-Aware Feature Fusion) employs conjugate-symmetry-guided dynamic low-pass filtering, similarity-based rearrangement, and adaptive high-frequency enhancement to recover degraded symmetric patterns. FSPRM (Fourier Series Profile Representation) utilizes the symmetric positive–negative frequency distribution to achieve compact parametric contour encoding and normalized centroid-shape description. FSDIM (Fourier Series Detection Inference) incorporates symmetric multi-scale branches, a rolling-optimization loss that eliminates phase interference while preserving coefficient-regression symmetry, and inverse Fourier transform for precise contour reconstruction and end-to-end detection. Extensive experiments on DOTA, AI-TOD, and UCAS-AOD demonstrate that our method achieves superior performance (mAP 82.18%, 51.2%, and 90.70%, respectively) and strong generalization, particularly in scenarios where symmetry is most severely compromised, confirming that exploiting these symmetry properties substantially boosts detection accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: