Retrospective cohort study evaluates faricimab outcomes in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, indicating significant improvements.
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate 12-month real-world outcomes of faricimab for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) in a multi-ethnic cohort. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive eyes with PCV diagnosed in routine care, treated with intravitreal faricimab, and with complete baseline and 12-month follow-up. One eye per patient was analyzed. Outcomes were reported for treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced eyes switched for persistent activity or limited durability. Primary endpoints were change in visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) at 12 months. Ethnicity-stratified outcomes were assessed secondarily. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 159 eyes (40 treatment-naïve, 119 treatment-experienced). In treatment-naïve eyes, mean VA improved from 61 (standard deviation [SD] 14) letters at baseline by + 6.8 letters (SD 16; P < 0.01) at 12 months, with CST reduction of - 54 µm (SD 100; P < 0.01) and mean 9.6 (SD 4.2) injections. In treatment-experienced eyes, paired VA change at 12 months was minimal (+ 0.27 letters, SD 12; P > 0.05), while CST decreased significantly by - 40 µm (SD 110; P < 0.01). Eyes received a mean of 8.2 (SD 4.2) faricimab injections over 12 months. Exploratory ethnicity-stratified analyses demonstrated baseline heterogeneity across groups, with broadly favorable anatomical and functional outcomes observed across the multi-ethnic cohort, but subgroup sizes precluded comparative efficacy assessment. CONCLUSIONS: In routine care, faricimab was associated with clinically meaningful visual improvement in treatment-naïve PCV and anatomical improvement in both treatment-naïve and -experienced eyes. Prospective studies with adequate ethnic representation are needed to validate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Ophthalmology and Therapy