Research Program Note proposes a new architecture for certifiable analytical plans in untrusted environments, suggesting security implications.
We propose an architecture in which the query planner of an analytical system is split into an untrusted searcher — probabilistic, external, possibly adversarial — and a small deterministic kernel that certifies every candidate plan before execution. The kernel discharges two independent obligations: lawfulness (the plan violates no law of the declared, data-adjudicated semantic model) and faithfulness (the plan implements the ask's denotation — plan ⊨ ask). We state a planning-sufficiency theorem: everything required to construct a certifiable plan is contained in the model's public logical projection, so planners are public buildable software and the projection boundary is simultaneously the security boundary. We report an eight-node plan IR extracted from a shipped system (Columna, Apache-2.0); the discovery that the shipped system already contains an uncertified dual-derivation seam the architecture would close; and an executed attack demonstrating a lawful-per-node plan that diverges from the faithful answer by 13–17% monthly (1.21× overall) on public demonstration data. A verified prior-art sweep bounds four regions where no published work was found: a metadata-sufficiency theorem for planning; LCF/PCC-descended kernels over data-adjudicated semantic models; dual lawfulness-plus-faithfulness certificates; certified plan-equivalence as a kernel duty. The governing doctrine: probability is admitted to search, never to adjudication. Version 1.0 stakes the program's claims and evidence as of 2026-07-27; items marked provisional await engine-path reproduction in v1.1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huayin Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: