Conjoint experiment explores how restrictive covenants impact occupational mobility perceptions among highly educated entrants, suggesting implications for contract design.
Using a conjoint experiment on highly educated labor market entrants in the Philippines, we examine how restrictive covenants shape perceived occupational mobility. Respondents compared hypothetical jobseeker profiles with randomized non‐compete, training repayment, and non‐solicitation clauses, then chose the likely applicant to four mobility pathways: vertical or lateral jobs within or across industries. Findings show that non‐compete clauses deter within‐industry and encourage across‐industry perceived mobility. Training repayment and non‐solicitation clauses exert targeted effects depending on scope conditions. Finally, these patterns hold across contractual breadth and firms' monitoring stringency, and are attenuated by positive beliefs about loyalty norms and perceived sufficiency of legal recourse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: