Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Characterizes mutations in Turkish patients, suggesting improved diagnostic strategies for NF-1.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Neurofibromatosis type 1 is an autosomal dominant neurocutaneous disorder. Clinical diagnosis is difficult in early childhood, and it is possible to miss a critical interval for tumour screening. In this study, we aimed to characterize the mutational spectrum of Turkish patients and discuss the benefits of molecular testing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty individuals from 35 unrelated families were included. Main referral reasons for genetic testing were as follows: to confirm a clinical diagnosis, to use in differential diagnosis and to evaluate first-degree family member of a known patient. Two-step process consisting of initial next generation sequencing of the NF1 gene and consequent multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification were performed. RESULTS: We identified a total of 30 variants in 28 individuals. Variant detection rate was 56% in the entire study group and 71.4% within the index patients. Four novel variants were found. Truncating variants constituted 60% of the entire mutation spectrum. A deletion or duplication was not detected. The most common feature was cafe au lait macules in 70% of the patients, followed by focal areas of signal intensity on brain imaging (26%), cutaneous neurofibromas (24%) and axillary freckling (24%). CONCLUSIONS: Early sequencing in all suspected patients followed by deletion/duplication analysis in patients meeting clinical criteria and a case-to-case based consideration for RNA studies seems to be the effective algorithm for NF-1 diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kocabey et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: