Key result
In patients receiving a drug-eluting stent for acute myocardial infarction, ejection fraction significantly increased from 48% at baseline to 55% at 5 months (P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does MRI-based myocardial perfusion and delayed enhancement imaging predict recovery of left ventricular function in patients with AMI after primary stenting?
Cohort (n=22)
Does MRI-based myocardial perfusion and delayed enhancement imaging predict recovery of left ventricular function in patients with AMI after primary stenting?
Absolute Event Rate: 55% vs 48%
p-value: p=<0.01
Delayed enhancement MRI performed 5 days post-AMI is a strong predictor of left ventricular functional recovery at 5 months in patients treated with primary stenting.
May aid post-AMI risk stratification with early DE-MRI; extends observational data but leaves open prospective validation.
Aims To study recovery of segmental wall thickening (SWT), ejection fraction (EF), and end-systolic volume (ESV) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients who underwent primary stenting with drug-eluting stents. Additionally, to evaluate the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based myocardial perfusion and delayed enhancement (DE) imaging. Methods and results Twenty-two patients underwent cine-MRI, first-pass perfusion, and DE imaging 5 days after successful placement of a drug-eluting stent in the infarct-related coronary artery. Regional myocardial perfusion and the transmural extent of DE were evaluated. A per patient perfusion score was calculated and consisted of a summation of all segmental scores. Myocardial infarct size was quantified by measuring the volume of DE. At 5 months after AMI, cine-MRI was performed and SWT, EF, and ESV were quantified. EF increased from 48±11 to 55±9% (P<0.01). SWT at 5 months was inversely related to baseline segmental DE scores (P<0.001) and segmental perfusion scores (P<0.001). EF and ESV at 5 months were related to acute infarct size (R2=0.65; P<0.001 and R2=0.78; P<0.001, respectively) and the calculated perfusion score (R2=0.23; P=0.02 and R2=0.14; P=0.09, respectively) at baseline. Conclusion Marked recovery of left ventricular function was observed in patients receiving a drug-eluting stent for AMI. DE imaging appears to be a better prognosticator than perfusion imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baks et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=22). Primary stenting with drug-eluting stents vs. Baseline was evaluated on Recovery of ejection fraction (EF) at 5 months (p=<0.01). In patients receiving a drug-eluting stent for acute myocardial infarction, ejection fraction significantly increased from 48% at baseline to 55% at 5 months (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: