Key result
Monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia was associated with significantly greater carotid IMT (0.74 vs 0.66 mm, p=0.038) and CAC scores (24.5 vs 2.65, p=0.0004) than polygenic hypercholesterolemia.
Why the study?
Does monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia compared to polygenic hypercholesterolemia associate with greater preclinical atherosclerosis in treated patients?
Observational
Yes
Does monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia compared to polygenic hypercholesterolemia associate with greater preclinical atherosclerosis in treated patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.74% vs 0.66%
p-value: p=0.038
Patients with monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia have a higher severity of preclinical atherosclerosis than those with a polygenic etiology, suggesting a need for more aggressive risk management in the monogenic group.
Monogenic FH may warrant closer monitoring than polygenic; leaves open whether genotyping improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common inherited disorder of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) metabolism. It is associated with higher risk of premature coronary heart disease. Around 60% of patients with a clinical diagnosis of FH do not have a detectable mutation in the genes causing FH and are most likely to have a polygenic cause for their raised LDL-C. We assessed the degree of preclinical atherosclerosis in treated patients with monogenic FH versus polygenic hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: FH mutation testing and genotypes of six LDL-C-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined using routine methods. Those with a detected mutation (monogenic) and mutation-negative patients with LDL-C SNP score in the top two quartiles (polygenic) were recruited. Carotid intima media thickness (IMT) was measured by B-mode ultrasound and the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was performed in three lipid clinics in the UK and the Netherlands. RESULTS: 86 patients (56 monogenic FH, 30 polygenic) with carotid IMT measurement, and 166 patients (124 monogenic, 42 polygenic) with CAC score measurement were examined. After adjustment for age and gender, the mean of all the carotid IMT measurements and CAC scores were significantly greater in the monogenic than the polygenic patients [carotid IMT mean (95% CI): 0.74 mm (0.7-0.79) vs. 0.66 mm (0.61-0.72), p = 0.038 and CAC score mean (95%): 24.5 (14.4-41.8) vs. 2.65 (0.94-7.44), p = 0.0004]. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a diagnosis of FH, those with a monogenic cause have a higher severity of carotid and coronary preclinical atherosclerosis than those with a polygenic aetiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharifi et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Familial hypercholesterolemia. Monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia vs. Polygenic hypercholesterolemia was evaluated on Carotid intima media thickness (IMT) (p=0.038). Monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia was associated with significantly greater carotid IMT (0.74 vs 0.66 mm, p=0.038) and CAC scores (24.5 vs 2.65, p=0.0004) than polygenic hypercholesterolemia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: