Key result
Different Hounsfield Unit segmentation thresholds yielded highly correlated subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue areas (r2=0.99), although their absolute values differed significantly.
Why the study?
To determine the effect of the preselected HU range on resulting adipose tissue volumes and establish whether a relationship exists between body shape and single-slice adipose tissue values.
Does the preselected HU range affect adipose tissue volume estimation and body shape correlation in single-slice CT segmentation?
Cross-Sectional (n=98)
No
Does the preselected HU range affect adipose tissue volume estimation and body shape correlation in single-slice CT segmentation?
Effect estimate: r2=0.99
While the segmentation threshold affects the absolute values of adipose tissue volumes, it does not substantially affect the correlation among them, and body shape can be accurately estimated from a single CT slice.
HU threshold may bias absolute adipose volumes on CT; leaves open standardization for cross-study body composition comparisons.
Several automatic and semi-automatic algorithms for adipose tissue (AT) segmentation in CT have been proposed.Our study aimed to determine the effect of the preselected HU range, on the resulting AT volumes and establish whether there is a relationship between body shape and AT values determined, from a single slice.Scans of 98 patients acquired using two CT protocols, were used.Three axial slices were selected from each subject's CT data.Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues (SAT, VAT) were manually segmented and analyzed using three different HU ranges.In addition, a simple BMI calculation model was created by the segmented data.The areas segmented with the three different HU ranges, correlated well with each other in the case of SAT (r 2 =0.99, and r 2 =0.99) and VAT (r 2 =0.99, and r 2 =0.998).The preselected slice position had no significant effect on correlation; however, the absolute values of ATs were statistically different.CT image data acquired with higher tube current yielded a better correlation between SAT, VAT, and BMI.We also found that the correlation of VAT area to mass and BMI was weaker than the corresponding SAT correlations.The simple model-based BMI estimation is in line with real BMI data (males: r 2 =0.78, females: r 2 =0.841).The segmentation threshold does not substantially affect correlation, among the segmented AT values; however, their absolute values are significantly different.In addition, and interestingly, the body shape can be accurately described from the segmented AT data from a single CT slice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egeresi et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Body composition / Adipose tissue estimation (n=98). Different Hounsfield Unit (HU) ranges for CT segmentation vs. Alternative HU ranges was evaluated on Correlation of segmented adipose tissue areas using different HU ranges (r2=0.99). Different Hounsfield Unit segmentation thresholds yielded highly correlated subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue areas (r2=0.99), although their absolute values differed significantly.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: