Key result
LV morphometric atlases link more strongly to cardiovascular risk factors than standard mass and volume.
Observational (n=4,547)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Left ventricular (LV) mass and volume are important indicators of clinical and pre-clinical disease processes. However, much of the shape information present in modern imaging examinations is currently ignored. Morphometric atlases enable precise quantification of shape and function, but there has been no objective comparison of different atlases in the same cohort. We compared two independent LV atlases using MRI scans of 4547 UK Biobank participants: (i) a volume atlas derived by automatic non-rigid registration of image volumes to a common template, and (ii) a surface atlas derived from manually drawn epicardial and endocardial surface contours. The strength of associations between atlas principal components and cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol and angina) were quantified with logistic regression models and five-fold cross validation, using area under the ROC curve (AUC) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) metrics. Both atlases exhibited similar principal components, showed similar relationships with risk factors, and had stronger associations (higher AUC and lower AIC) than a reference model based on LV mass and volume, for all risk factors (DeLong p < 0.05). Morphometric variations associated with each risk factor could be quantified and visualized and were similar between atlases. UK Biobank LV shape atlases are robust to construction method and show stronger relationships with cardiovascular risk factors than mass and volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilbert et al. (2019) reported an observational. Left ventricular morphometric atlases (volume and surface) vs. Reference model based on standard LV mass and volume was evaluated on Association with cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and angina) measured by AUC and AIC (p=< 0.05). Left ventricular morphometric atlases showed stronger associations with cardiovascular risk factors compared to a reference model based on LV mass and volume (DeLong p < 0.05 for all risk factors).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: