Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article proposes that patterns of dominance and deference have changed throughout human history. It further proposes that in the last half century such change has – due to culture and technology – accelerated. These fundamental shifts have not, however, had an impact on the leadership industry, which continues, erroneously, to presume that leaders are all-important, that followers are unimportant, and that context is other than central. It is concluded that leadership education and development must themselves adapt to the changing times – times in which leaders generally are losing power and influence, while followers generally are gaining.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbara Kellerman (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: