Statement reviews the challenges and implications of mouth-to-mouth ventilation in bystander CPR efforts.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by bystanders clearly improves survival of victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and other life-threatening conditions such as drowning and respiratory arrest [1, 2]. However, despite three decades of promulgation, CPR is not performed for the majority of victims who require lifesaving care [3–6]. Studies have identified reticence to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation as a significant barrier to more frequent performance of bystander CPR [1, 7–13]. In addition to acting as a barrier to initiation of CPR, the mouth-to-mouth ventilation component of CPR may have other adverse effects, such as promoting gastric inflation [14–17]or decreasing the percentage of time allocated to effective chest compression [18–20].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Becker et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: