// Fazila Asmar 1,* , Christoffer Hother 1,* , Gorjan Kulosman 1 , Marianne Bach Treppendahl 1 , Helene Myrtue Nielsen 1 , Ulrik Ralfkiaer 1,2 , Anja Pedersen 1 , Michael Boe Møller 3 , Elisabeth Ralfkiaer 2 , Peter de Nully Brown 1, and Kirsten Grønbæk 1 1 Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2 Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3 Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. * These authors contributed equally to the paper Correspondence: Kirsten Grønbæk, email: // Keywords : Epigenetic changes, DNA methylation, microRNA, Tumor suppressors, non-Hodgkin lymphoma Received : February 9, 2014 Accepted : March 30, 2014 Published : March 31, 2014 Abstract MiR34A, B and C have been implicated in lymphomagenesis, but information on their role in normal CD19+ B-cells (PBL-B) and de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is limited. We show that in normal and activated B-cells miR34A-5p plays a dominant role compared to other miR34 family members. Only miR34A-5p is expressed in PBL-B, and significantly induced in activated B-cells and reactive lymph nodes. In PBL-B, the MIR34A and MIR34B/C promoters are unmethylated, but the latter shows enrichment for the H3K4me3/H3K27me3 silencing mark. Nine de novo DLBCL cases (n=150) carry both TP53 mutation and MIR34A methylation (“double hit”) and these patients have an exceedingly poor prognosis with a median survival of 9.4 months ( P <0.0001), while neither TP53 mutation, MIR34A or MIR34B/C promoter methylation alone (“single hit”) influence on survival. The TP53/MIR34A “double-hit” is an independent negative prognostic factor for survival ( P =0.0002). In 2 DLBCL-cell lines with both TP53 mutation and promoter methylation of MIR34A, miR34A-5p is upregulated by 5-aza-2’deoxycytidine. Thus, the TP53/MIR34A “double hit” characterizes a very aggressive subgroup of DLBCL, which may be treatable with epigenetic therapy prior to or in combination with conventional immunochemotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asmar et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: