Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The author discusses his view that the risks of aggressive subplatysmal surgery are not balanced by substantial benefits. He emphasizes that aesthetic standards for neck contouring should not be based upon unrealistic criteria for the “youthful neck” but modified according to each patient's unique physiognomy. He stresses the need for reporting of large case series, standardized evaluation and surgical technique, and accurate data on complications of aggressive subplatysmal surgery before surgeons embrace these radical contouring techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Baker (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: