Establishing the optimum therapeutic dose of a putative antidepressant is important to avoid unnecessarily high doses, which may be associated with increased frequency of severity of unwanted side effects, or too low a dose which may not achieve the best therapeutic effect. Flexible dose regimes that are often used in clinical trial programmes may lead to the use of too high a dose because of the attribution of response in depression to the higher dose used later in the study rather than being identified as a delayed response to a lower dose used earlier. Fixed dose studies provide a more reliable view of the dose response relationship and, where differences between doses are small, metanalysis of large databases may provide a useful tool for the establishing of the minimum therapeutic dose. Metanalysis of the placebo controlled results with citalopram demonstrated that the dose-response curves based on log odds ratios showed a very flat curve across the 20-60 mg range and that 20 mg appeared therefore to be the minimum effective dose. There was evidence that in some subgroups of depressed patients a better response may be seen with a higher dose. For example in patients with severe depression citalopram was effective compared with placebo in doses of both 20 mg and 40 mg. However there was a more pronounced therapeutic effect with the higher dose. Similar results have been reported with other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S.A. Montgomery (1995) studied this question.