The Ellsberg paradox demonstrates that people's beliefs over uncertain events might not be representable by subjective probability. We show that if a risk averse decision maker, who has a well defined Bayesian prior, perceives an Ellsberg type decision problem as possibly composed of a bundle of several positively correlated problems, she will be uncertainty averse. We generalize this argument and derive sufficient conditions for uncertainty aversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halevy et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: