Key result
VEGFR1 deficiency suppresses macrophage recruitment, lymphangiogenesis, and angiogenesis in Vegf-A mice.
Examines VEGFR1's role in promoting lymphangiogenesis through macrophage recruitment, highlighting its importance in tissue growth.
OBJECTIVE: Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are complex phenomena that involve the interplay of several growth factors and receptors. Recently, we have demonstrated that in Keratin-14 (K14) promoter-driven Vegf-A transgenic (Tg) mice, not only angiogenesis but also lymphangiogenesis is stimulated. However, the mechanism by which VEGFR1 is involved in lymphangiogenesis remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: To examine how important the tyrosine kinase (TK) of VEGFR1 is in lymphangiogenesis in K14 Vegf-A Tg mice, we crossed the K14 Vegf-A Tg mice with VEGFR1-TK-deficient mice to generate double mutant K14 Vegf-A Tg Vegfr1 tk(-/-) mice. K14 Vegf-A Tg Vegfr1 tk(-/-) mice exhibit a remarkable decrease in lymphangiogensis as well as angiogenesis in subcutaneous tissues. To address the mechanism underlying the decrease in lymphangiogensis, we investigated the recruitment of monocyte-macrophage-lineage cells into the skin. The recruitment of VEGFR1-expressing macrophages driven by VEGF-A was reduced in K14 Vegf-A Tg Vegfr1 tk(-/-) mice. Vegf-A Tg mice that received VEGFR1-TK-deficient bone marrow showed a reduction of macrophage recruitment, lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis compared with those in K14 Vegf-A Tg mice. CONCLUSIONS: VEGFR1 signaling promotes lymphangiogenesis as well as angiogenesis mainly by increasing bone marrow-derived macrophage recruitment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murakami et al. (2008) studied this question. VEGFR1-TK deficiency vs. K14 Vegf-A Tg mice was evaluated on Lymphangiogenesis, angiogenesis, and macrophage recruitment. VEGFR1-TK deficiency reduced macrophage recruitment, lymphangiogenesis, and angiogenesis in Vegf-A Tg mice, demonstrating VEGFR1 signaling indirectly promotes these processes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: