Key result
Maximal quadriceps isometric strength %bodyweight strongly predicted exercise capacity in CAD patients, with cut-offs of 46%, 51%, and 59% predicting 5, 7, and 10 eMETs, respectively.
Why the study?
Does maximal quadriceps isometric strength predict exercise capacity in patients with recent coronary artery bypass grafting or myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=621)
Does maximal quadriceps isometric strength predict exercise capacity in patients with recent coronary artery bypass grafting or myocardial infarction?
Maximal quadriceps isometric strength measured by hand-held dynamometry is a strong predictor of exercise capacity in patients with recent CABG or MI, which can help set strength training goals.
QIS cut-offs associate with exercise capacity in CAD; hypothesis-generating for strength targets, requiring prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Quadriceps strength is related to exercise capacity in normal subjects and different patient populations, but the relationship between maximal quadriceps isometric strength (QIS) and different exercise capacity levels in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients has not been systematically evaluated yet. METHOD: We studied 621 patients (60.6 ± 9.9 years, 538 males) with recent coronary artery bypass grafting or myocardial infarction, who underwent treadmill exercise testing, maximal QIS measurement (hand-held dynamometry), and coronary arteriography. Maximal QIS was expressed as absolute value (kg), %bodyweight, and %predicted maximum. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship of maximal QIS, age, sex, number of diseased coronary vessels, peak systolic blood pressure, peak heart rate, brain natriuretic peptide, and left ventricular ejection fraction with 5, 7, and 10 estimated metabolic equivalents (eMETs) exercise capacity levels. RESULTS: Maximal QIS %bodyweight was the strongest predictor of exercise capacity in each eMETs category. Receiver-operating characteristics curves identified maximal QIS of 46, 51, and 59 % bodyweight as the best predictive cut offs for 5, 7 and 10 eMETs, respectively, with positive predictive values of 0.72, 0.66, and 0.67, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Maximal QIS is related with eMETs levels reached at exercise testing in CAD patients, and identified maximal QIS cut-off values for eMETs prediction may be used to set strength training goals according to patients' needs with regard to habitual physical activity level. Hand-held dynamometry may meet the need of easiness of use and low cost required for strength evaluation in large-scale clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamiya et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=621). Maximal quadriceps isometric strength (QIS) was evaluated on 5, 7, and 10 estimated metabolic equivalents (eMETs) exercise capacity levels. Maximal quadriceps isometric strength %bodyweight strongly predicted exercise capacity in CAD patients, with cut-offs of 46%, 51%, and 59% predicting 5, 7, and 10 eMETs, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: