Key result
Alpha helices D and E in HCN channels act as an affinity switch, increasing cAMP efficacy and affinity by 30-fold through interaction with helix C of the cyclic nucleotide binding domain.
Why the study?
It was unclear why the isolated cyclic nucleotide binding domain displays lower in vitro affinity for cAMP than the full-length HCN channel in patch experiments.
Identifies an intramolecular mechanism involving alpha helices D and E that acts as a high-affinity switch for cAMP in HCN pacemaker channels, increasing affinity by 30-fold.
Reveals HCN cAMP affinity switch; leaves open its role in cardiac pacemaking and therapeutic targeting.
Binding of cAMP to Hyperpolarization activated cyclic nucleotide gated (HCN) channels facilitates pore opening. It is unclear why the isolated cyclic nucleotide binding domain (CNBD) displays in vitro lower affinity for cAMP than the full-length channel in patch experiments. Here we show that HCN are endowed with an affinity switch for cAMP. Alpha helices D and E, downstream of the cyclic nucleotide binding domain (CNBD), bind to and stabilize the holo CNBD in a high affinity state. These helices increase by 30-fold cAMP efficacy and affinity measured in patch clamp and ITC, respectively. We further show that helices D and E regulate affinity by interacting with helix C of the CNBD, similarly to the regulatory protein TRIP8b. Our results uncover an intramolecular mechanism whereby changes in binding affinity, rather than changes in cAMP concentration, can modulate HCN channels, adding another layer to the complex regulation of their activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porro et al. (2024) studied this question. Deletion or mutation of alpha helices D and E in HCN channels vs. Wild-type HCN channels was evaluated on cAMP affinity (KD) and efficacy (K1/2). Alpha helices D and E in HCN channels act as an affinity switch, increasing cAMP efficacy and affinity by 30-fold through interaction with helix C of the cyclic nucleotide binding domain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: