Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Symbiotic relationships between wheat plants and mycorrhizal fungi may play an important role in the growth and productivity of wheat as a crop. Wheat cultivars differ in their ability to form such relationships, but little is known concerning the genetic basis of such differences. A set of intervarietal substitution lines having individual chromosomes from 'Cheyenne' (nonresponsive to mycorrhizae) substituted into 'Chinese Spring' (nonresponsive to mycorrhizae) were tested for mycorrhizal response in greenhouse experiments. Chromosomes 1A, 5B, 6B, 7B, 5D, and 7D of 'Cheyenne' had positive effects on the trait, with homologous groups 5 and 7 in the B and D genomes having the largest effects. Chromosome 5B of 'Hope', a nonresponsive cultivar, also had a positive effect in a 'Chinese Spring' background. In addition, the mycorrhizal responsiveness of a range of other cultivars and ancestors was tested to expand information on the trait in wheat and its relatives. Data on chromosome location of mycorrhizal-response genes and genotypic responsiveness will permit more effective genetic manipulation of this trait.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hetrick et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: