Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief Study Design. Cohort study. Objective. To describe the course of lost-time claims involving neck pain in workers compensated by the Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). Summary of Background Data. The prevalence of neck pain in workers varies from 27.1% to 47.8%. Very little is known about the course of work absenteeism related to neck pain. Methods. Our cohort included 5761 injured workers with an incident lost-time claim to the WSIB in 1997 and 1998. Claimants were followed for 2 years. We measured the cumulative time on lost-time benefits using the Kaplan–Meier method and described the number and duration of episodes on benefits. Results. The median cumulative time-on-benefits for the cohort was 13 days (95% CI: 13–14). The cumulative time on benefits was shorter for men than women and for younger than older workers. 14.2% of claimants experienced multiple episodes of work absenteeism during the 2 years after the initial claim. The median time on benefits for claimants with a single episode was 11 days (95% CI: 10–11). The median length of the first episode on benefits was longer for claimants with multiple episodes (19–22 days) compared with those with a single episode (11 days). Age was positively associated with longer time-on-benefits in claimants with a single episode of work absenteeism. Conclusion. Most injured workers who make a workers' compen-sation claim that involves neck pain do not make a second claim in the subsequent 2 years. However, an important minority (14.2%) experience multiple episodes of work absenteeism and these workers accrue 40.4% of all lost-time days. Recurrent claims involving neck pain represent a significant burden of disability in Ontario. Very little is known about the course of work absenteeism related to neck pain. In a cohort of 5761 injured workers with incident lost-time neck claims we found an important minority (14.2%) experience multiple episodes of work absenteeism. Recurrent neck pain claims represent a significant burden of disability in Ontario.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eerd et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: