Key result
Deep inspiratory gasp produced a biphasic pulse arrival time response, increasing by 59 ± 59 ms (p=0.001) and decreasing by -38 ± 55 ms (p<0.01) compared to quiet breathing.
Why the study?
Does wavelet analysis accurately quantify pulse arrival time changes during a deep inspiratory gasp in healthy adults?
Cross-Sectional
Does wavelet analysis accurately quantify pulse arrival time changes during a deep inspiratory gasp in healthy adults?
Mean Difference: 59
p-value: p=0.001
Wavelet analysis is a feasible method for quantifying physiological changes in pulse arrival time during a deep inspiratory gasp.
Supports wavelet analysis feasibility for PAT quantification; leaves open clinical vascular applications pending validation.
The physiological changes following a deep inspiratory gasp (DIG) manoeuvre have been described in the literature. However, the lack of a reliable signal processing technique to visualize and quantify these physiological changes has so far limited the applicability of the test to the clinical setting. The main aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using wavelet analysis to quantify the pulse arrival time (PAT) and its changes during the DIG manoeuvre. Vascular responses were extracted from cardiac (electrocardiogram, ECG) and peripheral pulse (photoplethysmography, PPG) waveforms. Wavelet analysis characterized their cardiovascular responses in healthy adult subjects in the time-frequency space, and for the ECG-PPG inter-relationship in terms of the PAT. PAT showed a characteristic biphasic response to gasp, with an increase of 59 ± 59 ms (p = 0.001) compared to the maximum value reached during quiet breathing, and a decrease of -38 ± 55 ms (p < 0.01) compared to the minimum value during quiet breathing. The response measures were repeatable. This pilot study has successfully shown the feasibility of using wavelet analysis to characterize the cardiovascular waveforms and quantify their changes with DIG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allen et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy. Deep inspiratory gasp (DIG) manoeuvre vs. Quiet breathing was evaluated on Pulse arrival time (PAT) changes (Increase of 59 ± 59 ms, p=0.001). Deep inspiratory gasp produced a biphasic pulse arrival time response, increasing by 59 ± 59 ms (p=0.001) and decreasing by -38 ± 55 ms (p<0.01) compared to quiet breathing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: