Key result
Validated predictive models using clinical variables and biomarkers can identify individuals at higher risk of developing atrial fibrillation and its complications, though gaps remain in predictive accuracy.
While current predictive models are useful for identifying AF risk and its complications, further research is needed to refine these models, especially for patients on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants.
May support AF risk stratification; leaves open model refinement for NOAC patients.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia associated with an increased risk of stroke and other complications. Identifying individuals at higher risk of developing AF in the community is now possible using validated predictive models that take into account clinical variables and circulating biomarkers. These models have shown adequate performance in racially and ethnically diverse populations. Similarly, risk stratification schemes predict incidence of ischemic stroke in persons with AF, assisting clinicians and patients in decisions regarding oral anticoagulation use. Complementary schemes have been developed to predict the risk of bleeding in AF patients taking vitamin K antagonists. However, major gaps exist in our ability to predict AF and its complications. Additional research should refine models for AF prediction and determine their value to improve population health and clinical outcomes, advance our ability to predict stroke and other complications in AF patients, and develop predictive models for bleeding events and other adverse effects in patients using non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1061-1066).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alonso et al. (2016) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Risk prediction models was evaluated. Validated predictive models using clinical variables and biomarkers can identify individuals at higher risk of developing atrial fibrillation and its complications, though gaps remain in predictive accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: