Key result
Following pacemaker implantation, ventricular stimulation impedance declined from 545 to 485 ohms at 13 months (p<0.01), and capture thresholds peaked at one month before declining.
Why the study?
What is the time course of atrial and ventricular stimulation impedance, capture threshold, and electrogram amplitude in patients with dual chamber pacemakers?
Cohort (n=63)
What is the time course of atrial and ventricular stimulation impedance, capture threshold, and electrogram amplitude in patients with dual chamber pacemakers?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Telemetric monitoring of pacemakers shows that stimulation impedances gradually decline over a year, while capture thresholds peak at one month and then decline.
To examine the time course of atrial and ventricular stimulation impedance, capture threshold, and electrogram amplitude, we obtained noninvasive telemetric data in 63 patients who underwent implantation of unipolar, endocardial pacing leads and a second‐generation dual chamber pacemaker with expanded bidirectional telemetry, including stimulation impedance, endocardial electrograms, and automatic capture threshold determination. On follow‐up of 9–20 months [mean, 15 months], all but six patients continued to pace in the DDD mode. To validate measurements made with telemetry, invasive measurements made directly with a pacing system analyzer at time of implant were compared with immediate postimplant telemetric measurements. Significant correlation of acute stimulation impedance was noted in both atrial (r = .7, p < .001) and ventricular (r = .8, p < .001) lead systems. The atrial stimulation impedance decreased from 538 ohms at implant to 471 ohms at 13 months (p < .01); the ventricular stimulation impedance similarly declined from 545 ohms to 485 ohms at 13 months (p < .0l). Capture thresholds peaked at one month, then declined: atrial, 1.2 V at implant vs 2.2 V at 1 month (p < .008) and 1.4 V at 13 months; ventricular, 1.1 V at implant vs 1.9 V at 1 month (p < .001) and 1.3 V at 13 months. There were no significant changes noted in atrial or ventricular electrogram amplitude following implantation. We conclude that there is close correlation of invasive recordings with those made telemefrically with this pacemaker at time of implant. Chronic atrial and ventricular stimulation impedances gradually decline for at least one year following implant, while electrogram amplitude in both chambers remains unchanged. Atrial and ventricular capture thresholds increase within one month after implant and thereafter decline for at least one year, but not to implant levels. Expanded bidirectional telemetry with such second‐generation units allows more precise and efficacious long‐term appraisal of the pacemaker‐myocardium interface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Platia et al. (1986) conducted a cohort in Patients requiring pacemaker implantation (n=63). Unipolar, endocardial pacing leads and a second-generation dual chamber pacemaker vs. Baseline (time of implant) was evaluated on Time course of atrial and ventricular stimulation impedance, capture threshold, and electrogram amplitude. Following pacemaker implantation, ventricular stimulation impedance declined from 545 to 485 ohms at 13 months (p<0.01), and capture thresholds peaked at one month before declining.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: