Key result
Dual loyalty and conflict of interest in sports medicine present significant ethical challenges for team physicians, requiring serious changes in their role to find an adequate solution.
Highlights the ethical challenges of dual loyalty and conflict of interest faced by team physicians in sports medicine.
Ethical conflicts for team physicians demand case-by-case safeguards in practice; leaves open empirical testing of resolution frameworks.
Team physicians have a complicated job that involves potentially conflicting obligations to multiple entities. Though responsible for the medical care of the athletes as individuals, they also have obligations to the team that employs them which can include returning athletes to play who are at heightened risk of re-injury. The fact that the athletes and owners have some overlapping interests (e.g. players playing well and winning games) only complicates this issue. Further, there are strong financial incentives to do what is necessary to obtain and keep a position as a team physician. This article examines dual loyalty and conflict of interest in sports medicine, and argues that there is not now a widely accepted or adequate solution to either. Moving toward a solution will require fairly serious changes in the role of the team physician.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen S. Hanson (2018) conducted a review in Dual loyalty and conflict of interest in sports medicine. Dual loyalty and conflict of interest in sports medicine present significant ethical challenges for team physicians, requiring serious changes in their role to find an adequate solution.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: