Technological leadership and innovation-driven growth have actualized the request for highly qualified personnel, which have recently been associated with holders of a scientific degree. In the academic field, a scientific degree is a testimony to the occupational status and an integral feature of professional growth and advancement. The reasonableness and significance of a scientific degree in the non-academic market are ambiguous. The purpose of this article is to investigate the opinion and assessments of the non-academic sphere representatives about the demand for the employees with a scientific degree and the status of a scientific degree outside the academic labour market. The research was conducted using the method of semi-structured interview with employers and representatives of seven enterprises in the south of Russia in the machine engineering, metalworking, ferrous metallurgy and IT sectors ( n = 13). As a result of the study it was established that: in employment a scientific degree does not give competitive advantages to the applicant; a scientific degree has no value in the non-academic labour market, does not contribute to the advancement and occupation of a higher position in the enterprise; a scientific degree and the presence of employees with a scientific degree in the staff are considered as image-building, status marker and reputation capital of the enterprise; employers have stereotypes regarding scientific employees, which are associated both with the individual organization of labour processes and the compatibility of the scientific, creative and production process; the non-academic sector lacks a human resources strategy for dealing with such employees and a system of their incentives. The authors conclude that the demand for a scientific degree in the non-academic labour market is caused largely by a political request related with the belief that technological and innovative breakthroughs can provide highly qualified personnel with a scientific degree. The authors focus on the probable risks associated with the massification of degree holders, that can lead to a blurring of academic culture and loss of identity of the scientific community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivanchenko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: