Twelve steers (373 kg initial BW) were used in three simultaneous 4 × 3 incomplete Latin squares to evaluate the effects of supplemental corn (1.8 kg/d, 0.14 kg CP/d), cooked molasses block (0.45 kg/d, 0.14 kg CP/d), and rumen-protected methionine (RPM; 3.5 g DL-methionine/d) on intake and digestion of prairie hay (5.7% CP, 72.3% NDF on DM basis). Steers that consumed the cooked molasses block ate more (P<0.05) forage OM (7.0 kg/d) and those fed supplemental corn ate less (P<0.05) forage OM (5.5 kg/d) than control steers (6.2 kg/d). Total OM intake was higher (P<0.05) for steers consuming the corn (7.0 kg/d) and cooked molasses block (7.3 kg/d) than for control animals (6.2 kg/d). Digestible OM intake was lower (P<0.05) for steers assigned to the control treatment (3.1 kg/d) than for steers consuming the cooked molasses block (3.9 kg/d) or corn (3.6 kg/d). Digestible NDF intake was higher (P<0.05) for steers assigned to the molasses block treatment (2.9 kg/d) and lower (P<0.05) for steers assigned to supplemental corn (2.0 kg/d) than for those steers assigned to the control treatment (2.4 kg/d). Although RPM increased plasma methionine concentrations (P<0.05), it was ineffective in stimulating forage intake or digestion. In summary, supplementation with a cooked molasses block increased digestible OM intake by increasing forage intake and digestion, whereas corn supplementation depressed forage intake but nonetheless increased total digestible OM intake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenwood et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: