Key result
Radiofrequency ablation of frequent premature ventricular contractions in cardiac resynchronization therapy nonresponders significantly improved mean left ventricular ejection fraction from 26.2% to 32.7%.
Why the study?
One-third of patients with CRT do not respond clinically with poorly understood causes, and whether frequent PVCs contribute to CRT nonresponse remains unknown.
Comparison
Radiofrequency ablation of PVC
Design
Multicenter prospective database study
Follow-up
12 ± 4 months
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“PVCs are an uncommon but potentially curable cause of nonresponse to CRT and repeated exacerbations of HF. The probable underlying mechanism is both low percentage of BiV pacing and detrimental effect of the arrhythmia itself, seen even in hearts without structural disease”
Randomized trial shows improved efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy in nonresponders to ablation, indicating potential treatment benefits.
Observational (n=65)
Yes
Mean Difference: 6.42
Absolute Event Rate: 32.7% vs 26.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Lakkireddy et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Nonresponders with frequent Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVC) (n=65). Radiofrequency ablation of PVCs vs. Pre-ablation baseline was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (mean improvement 6.42%, p=<0.001). Radiofrequency ablation of frequent premature ventricular contractions in cardiac resynchronization therapy nonresponders significantly improved mean left ventricular ejection fraction from 26.2% to 32.7%.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: