Validates MyPra-SIFTER for assessing hearing risk in preschool children, suggesting high specificity.
Early detection of hearing loss is essential to minimize academic and social delays in preschoolers. In Malaysia, the number of teacher-administered screening tools is limited. This study aimed to translate, adapt and validate the Preschool Screening Instrument for Targeting Educational Risk (Preschool SIFTER) into Malay for use by teachers. Face validity was assessed by 10 preschool teachers, with all items achieving ≥90% agreement. A total of 109 children aged 3–6 years were evaluated by 21 teachers using the Malay Preschool SIFTER (MyPra-SIFTER). Internal consistency was strong (Cronbach’s α = 0.95), and test–retest reliability, assessed with 23 students, was high (ICC = 0.95). Criterion validity was examined by comparing communication and social behavior classifications (‘Pass’ or ‘At-risk’) with DPOAE screening outcomes (‘Pass’ or ‘Refer’) for 78 children. Both the communication and social behavior domains demonstrated a sensitivity of 33.3%, with specificity of 98.2% and 96.5%, respectively. Significant differences in mean domain scores were found between DPOAE pass and refer groups (p < 0.05). The MyPra-SIFTER demonstrated strong reliability and high specificity, indicating its usefulness in identifying children unlikely to have hearing-related difficulties, while its lower sensitivity highlights the need for use alongside audiological screening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: