Key result
Combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation demonstrated a periprocedural residual flow rate of 9.11%, which was associated with a higher rate of bleeding events.
Why the study?
Complications such as residual flow, increased bleeding risk, or other adverse events remained unknown in patients receiving combined CA and LAAC one-stop therapy for nonvalvular AF.
What are the rates of adverse events associated with combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Meta-Analysis (n=952)
What are the rates of adverse events associated with combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure is reasonably safe and efficacious in patients with nonvalvular AF, though higher procedural residual flow is associated with increased bleeding events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Residual flow may heighten bleeding risk after combined procedures; supports safety data but leaves optimal technique open for randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) have been combined into a novel one-stop procedure for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, postoperative complications are relatively common in patients undergoing LAAC; the complications, including residual flow, increase in the risk of bleeding, or other adverse events, are unknown in patients receiving one-stop therapy. Therefore, we tried to evaluate the adverse events of CA and LAAC hybrid therapy in patients with nonvalvular AF. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis and computer-based literature search to identify publications listed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases. Studies were included if patients received CA and LAAC hybrid therapy and reported adverse events. RESULTS: Overall 13 studies involving 952 patients were eligible based on the inclusion criteria. In the periprocedural period, the pooled incidence of pericardial effusion was 3.15%. The rates of bleeding events and residual flow were 5.02 and 9.11%, respectively. During follow-up, the rates of all-cause mortality, embolism events, bleeding events, AF recurrence, and residual flow were 2.15, 5.24, 6.95, 32.89, and 15.35%, respectively. The maximum occurrence probability of residual flow events was 21.87%. Bleeding events were more common in patients with a higher procedural residual flow event rate (P = 0.03). A higher AF recurrence rate indicated higher rates of embolism events (P = 0.04) and residual flow (P = 0.03) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding events were more common in patients with a higher procedural residual flow event rate. However, combined CA and LAAC therapy is reasonably safe and efficacious in patients with nonvalvular AF. Further studies on the safety and efficacy of CA or LAAC alone are necessary in future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=952). Combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure was evaluated on Periprocedural residual flow (95% CI 6.06-12.45). Combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation demonstrated a periprocedural residual flow rate of 9.11%, which was associated with a higher rate of bleeding events.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: