Key result
Higher resting vagally-mediated heart rate variability assessed approximately 22 months prior to the pandemic significantly predicted greater use of cognitive reappraisal during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Why the study?
Most studies linking tonic heart rate variability to stress resilience are cross-sectional, precluding causal inferences.
Does baseline resting heart rate variability predict emotion regulation and affect during a stressful period (COVID-19 lockdown) in healthy adults?
Cohort (n=66)
Yes
Does baseline resting heart rate variability predict emotion regulation and affect during a stressful period (COVID-19 lockdown) in healthy adults?
Effect estimate: Unstandardized B 2.99 (95% CI 1.88-4.11)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Resting heart rate variability may serve as a longitudinal predictor and precursor of stress resilience and functional emotion regulation during highly stressful periods.
Due to its ability to reflect the capacity to engage in context-appropriate responses, tonic heart rate variability (HRV) is considered a putative biomarker of stress resilience. However, most studies are cross-sectional, precluding causal inferences. The high levels of uncertainty and fear at a global level that characterize the COVID-19 pandemic offer a unique opportunity to investigate the longitudinal role of HRV in stress resilience. The present study examined whether HRV, measured about 2 years earlier (Time 0), could predict emotion regulation strategies and daily affect in healthy adults during the May 2020 lockdown (Time 1). Moreover, we evaluated the association between HRV measures, emotion regulation strategies, subjective perception of COVID-19 risk, and self-reported depressive symptoms at Time 1. Higher tonic HRV at Time 0 resulted a significant predictor of a stronger engagement in more functional emotion regulation strategies, as well as of higher daily feelings of safeness and reduced daily worry at Time 1. Moreover, depressive symptoms negatively correlated with HRV and positively correlated with the subjective perception of COVID-19 risk at Time 1. Current data support the view that HRV might be not only a marker but also a precursor of resilience under stressful times.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makovac et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Healthy adults during COVID-19 lockdown (n=66). Resting vagally-mediated heart rate variability (vmHRV) vs. Lower vmHRV was evaluated on Cognitive reappraisal (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire score) (Unstandardized B 2.99, 95% CI 1.88-4.11, p=<0.0001). Higher resting vagally-mediated heart rate variability assessed approximately 22 months prior to the pandemic significantly predicted greater use of cognitive reappraisal during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: