cific bias" and "random patient interferences". We considered the latter two sources of error to be outside the scope of our study, in part because it is difficult to know how one might model the interferences. We did, however, discuss the importance of the continuing efforts of manufacturers to design instruments that avoid sources of error, such as those encountered by patients with special needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahsen et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: