The Social-Cognitive Model of Transference

clarify the psychometric properties of the drug use screening inventory for adolescent alcohol and drug abusers. Alcoholism: Clinical and Ex perimental Research, 18, 1335-1341. Levine, M.V., & Rubin, D.B. (1979). Measuring the appropriateness of multiple-choice test scores. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 269-290. , Levine, M.V., & Tsien, S. (1997). A geometric ap proach to two dimensional measurement. In A.J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision, and measure ment (pp. 207-223). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Reckase, M.D. (1997). The past and future of mul tidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 25-36. Roskam, E.E. (1985). Current issues in item re sponse theory. In E.E. Roskam (Ed.), Measure ment and personality assessment (pp. 3-19). Am sterdam: Elsevier Science. Roskam, E.E. (1997). Models for speed and time limit tests. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Ham bleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 187-208). New York: Springer Verlag. Roznowski, M. (1989). An examination of the mea surement properties of the Job Descriptive In dex with experimental items. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 805-814. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability us ing a response pattern of graded scores. Psy chometrika, 34(Suppl. 17). Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1988). Data analysis using item response theory. Psychological Bul letin, 104, 385-395. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Sci ence, 221, 453^58. Zickar, M.J., & Drasgow, F. (1996). Detecting fak ing on a personality instrument using appro priateness measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 71-87. Zickar, M.J., & Highhouse, S. (1998). Looking closer at the effects of framing on risky choice: An item response theory analysis. Organiza tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 75-91.