Formation and degradation of SsrA-tagged proteins enable ribosome recycling and elimination of defective products of incomplete translation. We produced an antibody against the SsrA peptide and used it to measure the amounts of SsrA-tagged proteins in Escherichia coli cells without interfering with tagging or altering the context of the tag added at the ends of nascent polypeptides. SsrA-tagged proteins were present in very small amounts unless a component of the ClpXP protease was missing. From the levels of tagged proteins in cells in which degradation is essentially blocked, we calculate that > or =1 in 200 translation products receives an SsrA tag. ClpXP is responsible for > or =90% of the degradation of SsrA-tagged proteins. The degradation rate in wild type cells is > or =1.4 min(-1) and decreases to approximately 0.10 min(-1) in a clpX mutant. The rate of degradation by ClpXP is decreased approximately 3-fold in mutants lacking the adaptor SspB, whereas degradation by ClpAP is increased 3-5-fold. However, ClpAP degrades SsrA-tagged proteins slowly even in the absence of SspB, possibly because of interference from ClpA-specific substrates. Lon protease degrades SsrA-tagged proteins at a rate of approximately 0.05 min(-1) in the presence or absence of SspB. We conclude that ClpXP, together with SspB, is uniquely adapted for degradation of SsrA-tagged proteins and is responsible for the major part of their degradation in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lies et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: