Key result
MitraClip-related infective endocarditis is associated with a 50% overall in-hospital mortality rate, with no significant difference between surgical (38.4%) and medical (58.3%) management.
Why the study?
Newer cardiac devices are perceived to be less prone to infection than surgical prostheses, but little data exist regarding MitraClip-related infective endocarditis.
Does surgical mitral valve replacement improve in-hospital mortality compared to conservative medical management in patients with MitraClip-related infective endocarditis?
Systematic Review (n=26)
Does surgical mitral valve replacement improve in-hospital mortality compared to conservative medical management in patients with MitraClip-related infective endocarditis?
Absolute Event Rate: 38.4% vs 58.3%
p-value: p=0.433
MitraClip-related infective endocarditis is a highly lethal complication (50% in-hospital mortality) predominantly affecting elderly, comorbid patients and frequently caused by Staphylococcus aureus, with no significant survival difference observed between surgical and medical management.
Scarce MitraClip IE data limit guidance; this SR extends the case-based literature but leaves optimal management open.
PURPOSE: Progress of interventional cardiology has boosted the use of newer cardiac devices. These devices are perceived to be less prone to infections compared to traditional surgical prostheses, but little data are currently available. In this systematic review (SR), we summarize current literature regarding the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with MitraClip-related infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS: We conducted a SR of PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus between January 2003 and March 2022. MitraClip-related IE was defined according to 2015 ESC criteria whereas MitraClip involvement as vegetation on the device or on the mitral valve. Risk of bias was assessed through standardized checklist and potential bias of underestimation cannot be excluded. Data regarding clinical presentation, echocardiography, management, and outcome were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-six cases of MitraClip-related IE were retrieved. The median age of patients was 76 [61-83] years with a median EuroScore of 41%. Fever was present in 65.8% of patients followed by signs and symptoms of heart failure (42.3%). IE occurred early in 20 (76.9%) cases with a median time between MitraClip implantation and IE symptom onset of 5 [2-16] months. Staphylococcus aureus was the major causative microorganism (46%). Surgical mitral valve replacement was needed in 50% of patients. A conservative medical approach was considered in the remainder. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 50% (surgical group: 38.4%; medical group: 58.3%; p = 0.433). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that MitraClip-related IE affects elderly, comorbid patients, is mostly due to Staphylococcus aureus, and has a poor prognosis irrespective of the therapeutic approach. Clinicians must be aware of the features of this new entity among cardiovascular infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bertolino et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in MitraClip-related infective endocarditis (n=26). Surgical mitral valve replacement vs. Conservative medical approach was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.433). MitraClip-related infective endocarditis is associated with a 50% overall in-hospital mortality rate, with no significant difference between surgical (38.4%) and medical (58.3%) management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: