Evaluates rehabilitation timing and dose on adverse outcomes in stroke patients, suggesting benefits of higher doses.
INTRODUCTION: Early rehabilitation guidelines lack a consensus on the optimal early rehabilitation regimen; hence, the impact of rehabilitation timing and dose on stroke recovery outcomes remains unclear. Using Japanese medical claims data within a target trial emulation framework, this study evaluated the safety of early in-hospital rehabilitation after stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study analyzed patients aged ≥ 18 years who were admitted to an acute hospital for acute stroke and received in-hospital rehabilitation within 2 days after admission, using the Japan Diagnosis Procedure Combination database (2018-2022). Rehabilitation exposures were defined as 6 predefined regimens (20-60 min/day initiated on days 1 or 2) and continued up to day 14. The outcome was the cumulative incidence of composite adverse events within 15 days after admission. A sequential, doubly robust estimator with a longitudinal modified treatment policy was applied, accounting for time-varying exposures and reducing potential time-related biases. RESULTS: Using a target trial emulation framework with doubly robust estimation, the incidence under the reference regimen was 11.2% (95% CI: 9.75%-12.60%). The highest incidence was 26.20% (95% CI: 24.30%-28.20%), corresponding to a risk ratio (RR) of 2.35 (95% CI: 2.03-2.72) compared with the reference. In contrast, several higher-intensity regimens were associated with lower incidences, with the lowest incidence of .49% (95% CI: .28%-.71%), yielding an RR of .04 (95% CI: .03-.07) versus the reference. However, intermediate-dose regimens showed variable associations across scenarios. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In this emulated trial, higher early rehabilitation doses were generally associated with a lower incidence of in-hospital adverse events. Regimens involving 60 min/day, particularly when initiated on day 1, showed the lowest estimated risk. However, the associations were not strictly linear, as intermediate-dose regimens demonstrated variable results across analyses. These findings suggest a potential benefit of adequately dosed early rehabilitation when clinically appropriate, while highlighting the importance of careful patient selection and monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: