Real-world study evaluates potassium binders in hyperkalemia management, highlighting adherence and cost differences.
INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalemia is a common and clinically relevant condition in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF), often limiting optimal use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi). METHODS: This real-world study evaluated adherence, clinical outcomes, and healthcare costs among Italian patients initiating patiromer, sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), or sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) between January 2022 and June 2024. RESULTS: Administrative data covering about 10% of the Italian population identified 1953 patients: 249 on patiromer, 387 on SZC, and 1317 on SPS. After full matching, 67.5% of patiromer patients were adherent at 6 months, compared with 20.4% for SZC and 0.5% for SPS (p < 0.001). Over the total follow-up, adherence remained higher with patiromer (42.5% vs 13.4% and 0.5%). During the first 6 months, HF-related hospitalization rates were lower with patiromer versus SZC (5.4 vs 12.8 events per 100 person-years; p = 0.079), becoming significant over overall follow-up (5.3 vs 15.7; p = 0.003). Composite HF outcomes at 6 months were also lower with patiromer compared with SZC (5.3 vs 17.4; p = 0.012) and SPS (3.4 vs 24.8; p = 0.005). At 12 months, total healthcare costs were significantly lower with patiromer than with SZC and SPS (€5645 vs €8500 and €4736 vs €6234; p < 0.001). Overall, patiromer use was associated with better adherence, fewer HF-related events, and reduced healthcare expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a patiromer potential role for sustained potassium binder therapy in supporting RAASi optimization and improving clinical management in routine practice, but confirmation through direct comparative prospective randomized trials is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fucili et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: