Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 30, 2026Intestinal ResearchOpen Access

Long-term efficacy and safety of vedolizumab compared with infliximab in biologic-naive ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AVAkhil Deepak VatvaniTHTimotius Ivan HariyantoDGDaniel A Gonzalez

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Systematic review and meta-analysis compares long-term outcomes of vedolizumab and infliximab in biologic-naive ulcerative colitis, suggesting vedolizumab is favorable.

Key Points

  • This meta-analysis evaluates the long-term efficacy and safety of vedolizumab compared to infliximab in biologic-naive ulcerative colitis patients.
  • Systematic search across MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov
  • Included biologic-naive UC patients with at least 12 months follow-up reporting outcomes of vedolizumab and infliximab
  • Performed random-effects meta-analyses to pool odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
  • Vedolizumab showed greater treatment persistence than infliximab at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months (no difference at 60 months)
  • Higher likelihood of achieving clinical and endoscopic remission at 12 months with vedolizumab
  • Lower incidence of serious adverse events and hospitalization rates with vedolizumab.

Cite This Study

Vatvani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6af4d560e2b924d3ea0514https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2026.00100
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share