Demonstrates improved flow-rate calculations in deep wells, indicating enhanced accuracy in multiphase flow analysis.
Conventional production logging interpretation methods exhibit substantial inaccuracies in deep high-temperature, high-pressure (HTHP) wells due to dynamic flow-pattern transitions and the depth-dependent accumulation of measurement errors, posing a critical challenge for accurate reservoir evaluation. To address these limitations, a novel Physics-Guided Proximal Policy Optimization (PG-PPO) framework is developed to construct an intelligent downhole correction agent. The proposed approach reformulates the depth-wise correction problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP), enabling systematic optimization under physical constraints. Its key methodological innovations include: (1) the incorporation of a physics-informed action clipping layer within the policy network to enforce the empirical fluid-dynamics relationship Cv = f(Re) in real time; (2) a constraint-prioritized experience replay mechanism to improve learning efficiency under sparse and high-cost physical constraints; and (3) the integration of a wellbore heat-transfer model with dynamic correction factors to enhance sensitivity in low-flow regimes. Validation using field production logging data from 12 producing wells in a continental oilfield in China demonstrates that the proposed PG-PPO framework reduces the average flow-rate calculation error to 5.2%, corresponding to reductions of 72.2% relative to the traditional Reynolds-number chart method and 39.5% compared with the TD3 algorithm. Meanwhile, the framework maintains a low constraint violation rate of 3.8% and achieves high correction coefficient stability (1.7 × 10 −3 ). This research provides an intelligent optimization solution for multiphase flow production profile interpretation, representing a significant step toward overcoming the accuracy limitations of traditional methods in extreme HTHP environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: