Investigates backside contribution to energy generation in bifacial PV panels, suggesting optimal conditions for use.
In times of energy crises, global pollution, and changing weather, the role of renewable energy sources in the green transition increases. Bifacial photovoltaic (PV) panels are becoming increasingly popular, but it is unclear how much the backside can improve their performance and under what conditions they are effectively applicable. This work investigates the maximum contribution of the back side for two similar snowy winter days with different illumination levels. The conclusion is that the backside significantly improves the performance of bifacial PV panels, if there is enough space behind them to reflect light. It contributed to the power generated by an average of 42.69 ± 6.32% for the sunny day and 53.36 ±7.9 % for the cloudy one. If the back side is with poor illumination, the performance degrades, and, in such cases, the bifacial PV panels should not be used. The difference in the energy generated by the studied models of BPV for the sunny and cloudy days reached values of 4.06 ±0.6 times, the average being 2.43 ± 0.36 times.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keseev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: