This article catalogs solution architecture patterns for efficient generative AI workloads, suggesting improved system performance.
Generative AI workloads place unusual demands on system architecture: inference is stateful, memory-bandwidth-bound, and bursty, and a single large model can saturate expensive accelerators while still leaving them underutilized. This article catalogs the solution-architecture patterns that have converged in production large-language-model (LLM) systems and organizes them into a layered reference architecture spanning the model gateway, orchestration, knowledge and caching, and the inference-serving cluster. We treat the core scaling primitives — continuous (in-flight) batching, PagedAttention-style KV-cache management, prefix and prompt caching, tensor parallelism, quantization, and speculative decoding — as composable patterns, and give the quantitative relationships that govern their cost and performance, including KV-cache memory growth, the throughput–latency trade-off, and an arithmetic-intensity (roofline) view of the prefill versus decode phases. We also cover application-level patterns (retrieval-augmented generation, agent orchestration, the model gateway, and semantic caching) and operational concerns (autoscaling, multi-tenancy, and reliability). The aim is a practitioner's map: which pattern solves which bottleneck, what it costs, and how the patterns combine. Public technical sources are cited throughout.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sushma Sunkollu Nagaraj (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: