Demonstrates nomological grouping of personality facets, indicating a new analytical framework.
While trait measures are often structured in an intercorrelation grouping approach (IGA) based on their covariations, we propose a nomological grouping approach (NGA) that bases structure on nomological similarities. The NGA is demonstrated with 15 BFI-2 facets and 96 different nomologicals, using LISS panel data. We subjected four facets × nomologicals matrices to factor analyses: unpartialized (UP), hetero-domain partialized (HDP: variance controlled from facets of other domains), auto-domain partialized (ADP: variance controlled from facets of the same domain), and fully partialized (FP: variance controlled from all other facets). The UP matrix yielded a well-interpretable 3-factor solution and the HDP matrix a 5-factor solution (essentially the Big Five), while the ADP and FP matrices did not yield sensible factor structures. Using Procrustes rotations, the UP solution, but not the ADP and FP solutions, could be coerced into a Big Five solution. Some, but not all, NGA factor solutions were similar to IGA factor solutions. Taken together, facets of the same domain cohered based on highly similar nomological networks, but removing shared variance in BFI-2 facets dissolved their nomological similarities. We discuss the NGA as a framework for establishing taxonomies or conducting psychometric analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rauthmann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: