Non-randomized cohort study compares weight loss efficacy of 2.5 mg vs. 5 mg tirzepatide, suggesting better tolerability for lower dose.
Background Obesity is a major global health issue. While tirzepatide demonstrates robust weight reduction in clinical trials, data comparing low maintenance doses (2.5 vs. 5 mg) in non‐diabetic adults with obesity remain limited. This study evaluated the comparative efficacy and safety of 2.5 versus 5 mg tirzepatide combined with lifestyle intervention. Methods This multicentre, prospective, non‐randomised cohort study enrolled non‐diabetic Japanese adults (18–65 years) with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 or ≥ 27 kg/m 2 with comorbidities. Patients initiated tirzepatide at 2.5 mg weekly; after 4 weeks, the dose was maintained at 2.5 mg or increased to 5 mg based on shared decision‐making. All participants received standardised dietary and exercise counselling. The primary outcome was the proportion achieving BMI < 25 kg/m 2 or > 15% body weight reduction at 6 months. Results Of 112 participants analysed (58 on 2.5 mg, 54 on 5 mg), baseline characteristics were well balanced (mean BMI 30.8 kg/m 2 ). At 6 months, the primary outcome was achieved in 62.1% of the 2.5 mg group and 63.0% of the 5 mg group (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.58–1.49; p = 0.772). Mean percent weight loss was −15.3% and −16.1%, respectively ( p = 0.563), with similar reductions in BMI, skeletal muscle mass, and bone mass. Adherence to dietary therapy was excellent in both groups (96.4%), while exercise adherence was 37.5%. Adverse events were more frequent with 5 mg (50% vs. 35%), primarily gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusion In non‐diabetic Japanese adults with obesity, 2.5 and 5 mg tirzepatide combined with lifestyle modification yielded similar weight loss at 6 months, with better tolerability at the lower dose. These findings support the potential utility of low‐dose tirzepatide strategies in real‐world practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amioka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: