Investigates myeloid activation responses in melanoma, suggesting potential therapeutic strategies.
Introduction Melanoma is responsible for 80% of skin cancer-related deaths. Approximately 50% of melanoma patients carry the BRAFV600E mutation, which promotes tumor growth. While the use of BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) has improved outcomes, acquired resistance is a persistent clinical challenge and the impact of BRAFi resistance on the immune tumor microenvironment (iTME) is incompletely understood. We have shown that the addition of the synthetic triterpenoid CDDO-Me to the BRAFi PLX4720 arrested resistance and significantly reduced tumor burden, while CDDO-Me as a single agent or in combination with BRAFi prior to resistance was ineffective. Thus, we hypothesize that this disparity in treatment efficacy may be attributable to temporally regulated BRAFi treatment-induced changes to the iTME. Methods Drug-induced changes in the iTME pre and post-resistance were characterized in tumors of engrafted transgenic BRAF/Pten mice using scRNA-seq, flow cytometry, and ELISA. T cell proliferation assays were used to assess functional changes in tumor-conditioned myeloid cells. Results BRAFi treatment attenuated immunosuppressive myeloid activation pre-resistance, while BRAFi resistance was associated with enhanced tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) recruitment and immunosuppressive myeloid subset activation. However, the addition of CDDO-Me to BRAFi at resistance reversed these outcomes and rescued the ability of TAMs to induce T cell proliferation. Conclusion The iTME changes with tumor progression and responds dynamically to BRAFi treatment and resistance. This work establishes for the first time that BRAFi promotes myeloid-mediated induction of T cell activation, which is lost at resistance but can be rescued with the addition of CDDO-Me. Because BRAFi resistance and iTME immunosuppression is reversed by CDDO-Me treatment, these results provide the foundation for its potential use in combination therapies for melanoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: