Reveals ground deformation patterns in the Campi Flegrei caldera, suggesting significant geophysical processes.
Understanding the spatio-temporal structure of ground deformation in caldera systems remains a major challenge because multiple processes may coexist and interact across different spatial and temporal scales. The Campi Flegrei caldera provides an exceptional natural laboratory to investigate these dynamics through long-term geodetic observations. Here, we integrate three decades of multi-mission Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (DInSAR) data to retrieve the spatio-temporal evolution of the ground displacement field. We analyse the resulting dataset using a kinematic decomposition in which the deformation field is expressed as the sum of (i) a time-invariant spatial pattern modulated by a time-dependent amplitude and (ii) a spatially variable constant-velocity component. Our results show that the observed deformation is largely governed by a dominant spatial pattern that remains remarkably stable through time, while its temporal amplitude reproduces both subsidence and uplift phases. In addition, a secondary constant-velocity component, with amplitudes of only a few mm yr−1, is required to account for residual spatial variability, particularly in the south-eastern sector of the caldera. A transition in deformation behaviour around 2012–2013 is associated with a south-westward expansion of the dominant deformation pattern. The inferred dominant spatial patterns are consistent with a persistent deformation source located at a depth of approximately 3–4 km, whereas the secondary spatially variable constant-velocity field is compatible with a deeper expansion process. These findings indicate that long-term caldera deformation can be effectively represented within a low-dimensional kinematic framework. This approach provides a robust basis for the interpretation of geodetic time series and for the identification of changes in deformation regime in restless caldera systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amoruso et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: