Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comprehensive review highlights deep learning algorithms and hardware solutions for defect detection in electronics manufacturing.
The fast growth of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 is causing an increasing need for high-quality electronics and, consequently, defect-free Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs). Traditional computer vision-based inspection systems cannot meet modern manufacturing environment demands since these systems fail to meet the requirements of real-time processing. The present paper provides a review and analysis of existing PCB defect detection technologies, paying attention to four areas: deep learning-based defect detection algorithms, specialised computing platforms, hardware acceleration approaches, and their hybrids. Among the available deep learning approaches, the You Only Look Once (YOLO) framework stands out as a high-performing method, achieving high detection accuracies while enabling real-time defect detection. The specialized computing platforms, particularly Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), have demonstrated considerable potential due to their low-latency processing capabilities and high energy efficiency. However, several challenges remain unresolved, including limited generalization across different defect categories, the scarcity of adequately annotated datasets, and insufficient validation under real-world operational conditions. To overcome these challenges, this paper suggests adopting a comprehensive framework that combines image acquisition, image pre-processing, deep learning-based defect detection, and an adaptive system updating process. Further directions for future studies may include utilizing physics-based modeling for better defect representation, improving model explainability via data-centric methods, and exploring the concept of model-less or self-adapting neural networks. This will enable the development of highly efficient and real-time PCB quality inspection frameworks for use in industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shivani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: