Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares the discharge characteristics of two simulation models in plasma thrusters, suggesting model efficiency variations.
A two-dimensional, axial-radial, five-moment (5M) fluid model is developed to simulate the cross-field plasma discharge of a Hall effect thruster and is compared with a particle-in-cell Monte Carlo collision (PIC-MCC) simulation. In the 5M model, we account for a non-neutral plasma and inertial effects in the conservation of momentum, which are usually neglected in quasineutral drift-diffusion treatments for electrons. In addition, we propose a boundary condition that accounts for the virtual cathode formation due to secondary electron emission, which plays a critical role in obtaining a steady-state solution. Ions are treated with a multi-fluid approach, accounting for separate high- and low-energy subpopulations. Qualitative agreement is observed in the spatial profiles of many plasma properties. The steady-state discharge current in the PIC-MCC model is found to be higher than that of the 5M model, which is hypothesized to be due to the anisotropic pressure contributions absent in the 5M model. A sensitivity study is performed wherein the field-aligned thermal conductivity in the 5M model is reduced, leading to non-isothermal electron temperature profiles along the magnetic field lines, consistent with observations from the PIC-MCC results. The advantages and limitations of the 5M model compared to existing fluid approaches are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Troyetsky et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: