Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study investigates criterion validity of 24HMBQ against accelerometer data in college students, suggesting its utility for assessing movement behaviors.
Background Accumulating studies have investigated the combined effects of 24-h movement behaviors on physical and mental health. The 24-hour Movement Behaviors Questionnaire (24HMBQ) was recently developed to measure the 24-hour movement behaviors in college students. However, its criterion validity remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the criterion validity of the 24HMBQ against accelerometer-derived data among Chinese college students. Methods Eighty-eight college students (age = 20.2 ± 2.2 years) participated in this study. The Axivity AX3 accelerometers were used to objectively measure physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior (SB), and sleep levels over a consecutive seven-day period. At the last day, participants completed the 24HMBQ to self-report their PA, SB, and sleep levels. Paired-sample t -test, Spearman’s rank correlation test, and Bland-Altman plot were used to examine the degree of agreement between 24HMBQ and accelerometer data. Results Spearman’s correlation coefficients indicated strong agreement for sleep metrics (Rho = 0.77, p < 0.001 for weekdays; Rho = 0.68, p < 0.001 for weekends) and moderate agreement for SB (Rho = 0.55, p < 0.001 for weekdays; Rho = 0.33, p < 0.01 for weekends) between 24HMBQ and accelerometer measurements. However, lower correlations were observed for physical activities including light PA (Rho = 0.30, p < 0.01) and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA; Rho = 0.15, p > 0.05). Conclusion The 24HMBQ showed good criterion validity for sleep and moderate validity for sedentary behavior, but limited validity for physical activity (especially MVPA).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: