Compares fish-passing efficiency in bilateral-symmetric and vertical-slot fishways, suggesting improved migration for fish.
A novel bilateral-symmetric, multi-slot fishway (BMSF-R11) was recently developed, which has more migration space for fish, and lower mainstream velocity and turbulence than traditional vertical-slot fishways (VSFs) under the condition of the same slot width. This study aims to verify that, relative to a VSF, the BMSF-R11 is more favorable for the upstream migration of moderately swimming fishes. Three-dimensional numerical simulations were performed to determine hydrodynamic properties in both a VSF and the BMSF-R11, and laboratory fish-passage experiments using silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, a moderately swimming fish species) were conducted to provide fish-passing characteristics. As expected, the BMSF-R11 possessed much higher fish-passing efficiency than the VSF (e.g., the passage success rate (PSR) was 90–93% vs. 57–63% and the entrance efficiency (EE) was 90–98% vs. 55–63%), due to the former’s much better hydrodynamic performance. There are two primary roughly linear fish-passing paths in a VSF, but four primary S-shape fish-passing paths are present in the BMSF-R11. Furthermore, this study reveals the inherent relationships among fish-passing efficiency parameters, fish-swimming trajectory, fish-occurrence frequency, and hydrodynamic properties in both a VSF and the BMSF-R11. This study contributes to conserving fishery resources and aquatic biodiversity, especially for migratory fish with moderate swimming abilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: