Key result
1.5-T MRI scanning in patients with ICDs or CRT-Ds with quadripolar LV leads was safe, with 100% meeting LV pacing capture threshold and 98% meeting LV sensing amplitude endpoints.
Why the study?
While MRI scanning of MR-conditional ICDs can be performed safely under specific protocols, MRI safety with CRT-Ds incorporating quadripolar LV leads remained less clear.
Is 1.5-T MRI scanning safe and free from negative impact on device function in patients with ICDs or CRT-Ds incorporating quadripolar LV leads?
Observational (n=230)
Is 1.5-T MRI scanning safe and free from negative impact on device function in patients with ICDs or CRT-Ds incorporating quadripolar LV leads?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports conditional MRI use in these patients; extends observational data to quadripolar LV leads but remains hypothesis-generating.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning of magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional cardiac implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can be performed safely following specific protocols. MRI safety with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (CRT-Ds) incorporating quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads is less clear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ICDs and CRT-D systems with quadripolar LV leads after an MRI scan. METHODS: The ENABLE MRI Study included 230 subjects implanted with a Boston Scientific ImageReady ICD (n = 39) or CRT-D (n = 191) incorporating quadripolar LV leads undergoing nondiagnostic 1.5-T MRI scans (lumbar and thoracic spine imaging) a minimum of 6 weeks postimplant. Pacing capture thresholds (PCTs), sensing amplitudes (SAs), and impedances were measured before and 1 month post-MRI using the same programmed LV pacing vectors. The ability to sense/treat ventricular fibrillation (VF) was assessed in a subset of patients. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients completed a protocol-required MRI scan (MRI Protection Mode turned on) with no scan-related complications. All right ventricular (RV) and left LV PCT and SA effectiveness endpoints were met: RV PCT 99% (145/146 patients), LV PCT 100% (120/120), RV SA 99% (145/146), and LV SA 98% (116/118). In no instances did MRI result in a change in pacing vector or lead revision. All episodes of VF were appropriately sensed and treated. CONCLUSION: This first evaluation of predominantly CRT-D systems with quadripolar LV leads undergoing 1.5-T MRI confirmed that scanning was safe with no significant changes in RV/LV PCT, SA, programmed vectors, and VF treatment, thus suggesting that MRI in patients having a device with quadripolar leads can be performed without negative impact on CRT delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rinaldi et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Patients with ICDs or CRT-Ds incorporating quadripolar left ventricular leads (n=230). 1.5-T MRI scan was evaluated on Pacing capture thresholds (PCTs) and sensing amplitudes (SAs) effectiveness endpoints. 1.5-T MRI scanning in patients with ICDs or CRT-Ds with quadripolar LV leads was safe, with 100% meeting LV pacing capture threshold and 98% meeting LV sensing amplitude endpoints.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: